0

Is Getting all the Zygarde pieces really worth it? (Pokemon Sun and Moon Tips/Spoilers ahead)

Hey guys! Still working on retooling and re organizing the site. As I am going through the process it has made me wonder if I should  get rid of older, ramble-ly opinion pieces. But, I really want to make content in the mean time until I reboot other content, so for now, have some more of my ramblings.

Also possible CW/TW warnings for language and other things

also: Mother fucking spoilers

Gamefreak has a really weird fetish of making Pokemon that are both super powered but also useless.

Sheninja is a good example. This Pokemon that evolves in a weird way, but only has one Hp. On the other hand it has an ability that only lets it take damage in a very specific way. This Pokemon takes skill to use but done right it can be a force to be reckoned with. But literally, if you do hit it, that is IT. Revives or Pokemon centers, cause that dude is dead. Or, re dead. Okay, fainted. Whatever. They can’t take hits. That was the point.

Also on a separate point, Sun and Moon has features that are really divided amongst the “Pokemon Community.”  I wouldn’t mind the changes to fishing in Sun and Moon, iiiiiiiiiif the encounter rates weren’t painfully low. Dratini took hours to find and I am still looking for Feabas. Also, I like grooming/ Poke Refresh over Amie and some of the other changes, I just think they need to be more refined if used in future games. Like, options to groom outside after battle, or Pokemon Amie features where you could encounter other trainers Pokemon via the online communication. The second of those two should have been able to happen in Poke Pelago or Festival Plaza. I like festival plaza because it streamlines where the mini-games are with where the battles and trades are, but it can be a little lack luster at times, even after putting effort into it. Poke Pelago is great too, just the upgrade costs are high and therefore some of it’s best stuff is a little less accessible than it could be. Also, as much as I prefer both over super training, I think there needs to be some tweaks before either festival plaza/ Pelago/ Hyper training really replace what six gen super training does. And SOS battles are great for shinny hunting, or can be, but can make regular Pokemon catching a pain.

Don’t get me wrong, I LOVE sun and moon. I thought I put a lot of hours into ORAS, but on Alpha sapphire I have an 80 hour play through. In the first four days Moon was out I was already at half that and I could easily get to 300 by the time the games have been out for a Month. Or, it is at least possible. Sun and Moon I have found to be one of my favorite poke experiences thus far. Although even if the pros out weigh the cons, it’s important not to gloss over the cons.

But the real reason I went on about Game freaks weird thing about creating certain types of Pokemon  and Sun and Moon features is because, nothing in Sun and Moon Mirror both things quite like Zygarde.

To create Zygarde’s formes? You have to find all 100 of his pieces and put him together. And honestly? It can be tougher than it looks. I had no problem, I was finding them left and right. But even after beating the post game I still had maybe 80 of the 100 pieces. Most of the ones I was missing where in places I was sure I checked 800 times so why would I go there? ugh. Maybe it won’t be as difficult for those who are master collectathoners or those who are just gifted back trackers, but I really feel getting all 100 pieces? Isn’t a walk in the park. Even if you find 99 of them easy, there will be ONE that you will spend hours trying to find.

But here is the thing, what do you GET for all of it?

Dragon/ Ground type that Zygarde has is not impervious to hits and still has lots of weaknesses. However, the Complete form can make up for that. But my problem was is that I fundamentally misunderstood how they were going to do Zygarde in the game. I thought that Zygarde would always have the ability to turn into complete form when in danger, and if you collected all 100 pieces he stayed his perfect, over powered form. Yeah, that is not what happens at all ever. See, Zygarde only gets the ability when you get all 100 pieces. So you keep Zygarde in one of his other forms, and then, if he gets to half health, then he kicks butt. Now, if you have someone who can kill Zygarde in one shot, then Zygarde is useless basically even after all the work you did. Or, if the first shot does just under full damage and the second shot Crits, Zygarde is again useless.

That is a huge feature to implement in a game for a Pokemon that could get it’s but kicked so easily. HOWEVER, Zygarde can take some hits like a champ. I mean, it is a legendary. Mine has taken super effective hits, even some critical hits, and lived. That typically triggers it’s ability, which also heals it and boosts its stats. It’s basically a mega evolution of Zygarde, but like Rayquaza it has special criteria. And though it isn’t invincible and still has the weaknesses that Zygarde normally has, used rightly, it can be devastating.

Speaking of using it effectively, here’s a tip I must have skipped over. I was getting more Zygarde pieces, specifically the cores, and taking Zygarde apart and butting him back together. He wouldn’t learn new moves. What? Well, the Zygarde cube also doubles as an TM/HM teacher. If you want the best of Zygarde’s signature moves, use the cube when you collect cores to teach your over powered critter. With that and the move reminder I was able to get a move set that I think really works for my Frankenstein’s creation. It isn’t perfect, it can still faint, but moves like Core enforcer basically nullifies the ability of any creature you have done damage too. That comes in handy. 

So, is getting Zygarde worth it? Well it is a weird feature that gives you a Pokemon that can be kinda meh to super amazing depending on how you use it. It is unique, and as a fan of shows like Power Rangers and Transformers as a kid, or the new Netflix Voltron show, I would be lying if I said I wasn’t super in love with the design. It’s awesome. I love my Mega Zord Pokemon. It’s awesome. If I comeplete the quest in the Sun as I have in Moon? I am naming my second one Megas XLR (another good Giant robot show).

It’s up to you, but I think it was worth it. I just think with some of the things I know now it will be easier and more rewarding when I play through the other version of them Game. Either way, I hope you enjoy the game, or if you don’t, you got some other good shit in your life that can make it less sucky.

 

See you guys next time

0

F**k you Primarina is awesome as shit. Another little rant (yes about Pokemon shut up it’s great)

Hey guys! Still working on retooling and re organizing the site. As I am going through the process it has made me wonder if I should  get rid of older, ramble-ly opinion pieces. But, I really want to make content in the mean time until I reboot other content, so for now, have some more of my ramblings.

Also possible CW/TW warnings for language and stuff.

Also maybe spoilers.

Okay, so.

Pokemon sun and moon are out and as long as there have been trailers, people have had their opinions about the guys you could start your new adventure off with. I have long been on the water starter team, and if I am going to be completely honest… I was at first put of by Popplio.

I think my first reaction was something on the lines of “It’s like Mister Mime Fucked a seel or Dewgong. And then I realized the reason it might have the clown nose, that was pink, and the clown nose for a reason, after seeing a game play demonstration and Popplio learning a certain move. That like Mister Mime, also a clown who looks goofy and kinda weird, that the Popplio line might get the fairy typing. The cutesy element and pink coloration were a dead give away.

Now I haven’t played every Pokemon generation. But in the early ones I played, as well as with the newer ones, is that Dragon is a pretty bad ass typing. It might not be as over powered as it may have been in the past, but often dragon types had high stats and good move-sets to counter weaknesses (as far as I can remember). Having a Pokemon that had one of it’s few weaknesses was an asset for setting yourself against one particular trainer as well (wink wink nudge nudge).

And this is why Fairy was kind of a big deal when it was introduced into X and Y. It too had few weaknesses and was strong against  dragon.  My brother would not shut up about how much of a big deal Laparas was because it, with a high enough level and the move blizzard, would destroy dragon types. With it’s stats as well, it could take a hit and be pretty hard core.

But the Fairy type added a whole knew dimension to team building, and it was amazing to see power dragons (though a lot are kinda goofy looking too) be terrified of a Wigglytuff. Not they weren’t bad ass before, but they were even more so now.

So when Popplio’s line had confirmed fairy typing? I was ecstatic. It wasn’t invincible by any means, but here was a starter that could pack, hypothetically, the same Punch as my Bros Laparas but was a STARTER. In fact ( SPOILERS) while actually playing the game there was one tough Dragon type Totem Pokemon who was quad weak to Fairy cause of their secondary typing (fighting) that I K.O.ed in one shot. Dragons beware, Primarina is here!

Now, with all trailers I have been following and lore and stuff I have been reading up on, I am pretty much in love with all the New starters to some level. I am just mad at myself that I didn’t realize how cute and awesome my little friend was until they started kicking ass. They are a great partner and I don’t regret choosing them one bit.

For those of you who don’t like them because they are  “feminine” or underestimate how much they can bring to the table?

FUCK YOU. Primarina kicks ass! Oh yeah.

0

Cheating in Video games? A counter perspective/ rant (With a Pokemon Focus)

Hey guys! Still working on retooling and re organizing the site. As I am going through the process it has made me wonder if I should  get rid of older, ramble-ly opinion pieces. But, I really want to make content in the mean time until I reboot other content, so for now, have some more of my ramblings.

Content warnings for multiple reasons below, because I am not sure if there will be stuff that will be an issue but it never hurts to have a warning just encase. Also, a lot of these rants may center around Pokemon cause holy dick, I have been playing a lot of it recently. This particular writing shouldn’t have any spoilers for the newest games, but again, warning just to cover bases.

SO. There is a feature, that can actually be traced all the way back to the first games that a lot of people associate with “cheating” in Pokemon. It’s first iteration? The EXP All.

A quick refresher just encase people reading don’t have any idea of what the dick I am talking about. Basically when your Pokemon does anything of value, it will measure it’s progress through Experience and levels. More experience points you get, your level goes up, more cool shit you can do with your Pokemans and the more badass it becomes (some more than others). For anyone who played pokemon ever this isn’t really news, and though Pokemon go is a tad different? It follows very similar concepts, even with minor tweaks.

Now, The Exp ALL means that it isn’t just the Pokeman who did the thing who gets the points. It’s everyone on your team. So the argument is that, it’s cheating, isn’t it? I mean, Pokemans who didn’t do fuck all are getting rewarded and becoming more badass even when they didn’t do anything. Also, they becoming more badass means it is easier to take on more badass trainers. Did you really earn your right to face against the most powerful trainers in game if some got a free ride?

And here’s the thing. In the first game it didn’t matter as much for two reasons: 1) you got the item so late in the game you would have made your dudes put in the work anyway to get that far, and 2) sigh… the gen one item is god damn useless. 

SERIOUSLY WTF. Like, Hey, the Pokemon you choose at the start of the game beat another trainer. They get 1000 exp, and everyone else gets 6. HOLY HELL WHAT A COMMUNIST NIGHTMARE SOCIALISM IS RUNNING THE WORLD.

Yeah, it was pretty awful. Now, when it came to things like say taking a pokemon that was useless and trying to get it to change into it’s badass form (*cough cough* Magikarp) this item was useless and didn’t change much. It was almost easier almost to level them up the way you did for your other Pokemon in the beginning of the game. On that note of Pokemon that were a pain to train, the next generation of Pokemon games  added a new, special feature that was necessary to make some other Pokemon get stronger, called “friendship” or “happiness.” This stat would be a painful, annoying little thing to turn super cute but ultimately push over critters into more tough ones through the power of being nice to them (you totally thought I was going to say “the power of friendship” lol). Here is the thing. If that Pokemon lost a battle (meaning it can take more damage, was fainted, and had to be healed up) it would lose happiness points.

Both the examples above show not really an increase of difficulty in the game, but more of length. It wasn’t necessarily hard evolving these weak Pokemon or getting them to be friendly (in some cases it is) but in reality it just makes a process of turning your team into a stronger, happier force into a longer one.

The solution to this problem is simple. Take the Exp All from the first game and retool it, giving reasonable rates of exp to all the pokemon on your team so they get stronger,  so they can participate in battles themselves, and earn EXP for the rest of the team. If you give the item to the player earlier in the game, the more likely they can take a weak Pokemon that requires happiness to evolve and making it stronger earlier. Making it more likely to get more happiness, evolve, and be bad ass.

See, so later games did that. They changed the EXP ALL to the Exp share and made it more accessible. This also meant either you were going to make one team member do all the work even more, cause everyone was going to get EXP anyway, or, that it would be easier to make use of other members on your team earlier on and allows younger and more inexperienced players the same chance to have similar variety or strategies and teams as those players who are older and better at the game.

And this becomes the controversy, it makes the game “easier.” But really, the thing that surprises me about that argument is, well for one: you can turn the item off?  Whether you use it, how often you use it, what you use it for and when is up to YOU.  If YOU find it makes things to easy, don’t use it?

Also, it’s weird to me about how adults talk about how easy a game is, especially when 1) some of them play competitive levels that are always going to be harder than the main story, 2) that is customizable to the point you can make your own level of difficulty if you really wanted, and the point I can’t stress enough, 3) its made for children. It’s a children’s game. I mean they can through all the references to the old stuff, or add old characters in it… but it’s a franchise that will probably always be focused on kids. Adults whining about how easy a game for kids is kind of ironic, because it enforces one awful stereotype of Adults who do enjoy these games: that they never grew up/ are whinny and entitled.

But before I slam people some more and seem like I am being heavy handed and unfair, there is a fair counter point to the last statement. Kids aren’t dumb. The idea that kids need hand hold-y, do everything for you games is a little condescending.  Especially when a lot of the kids who first played these games did beat them and did a lot of the hard stuff. But all that is why point two from the above paragraph is so important. With a game where you choose your team, and the very moves your team uses, and which items you use to support your team, it would be really easy to make the game harder for yourself if you chose to do so. Though I am not a fan of  “Nuzlocks” myself, really that very concept is doing just that: creating a harder difficulty with an established set of additional rules to add difficulty to a kids game. So those who aren’t challenged enough by the original games can get exactly what they are looking for: making the game more challenging.

It is also weird because when people talk about how difficult Pokemon games and who easier they are, are we still talking about the same game where for a long time people can’t even complete the game depending on where they live and certain times? See, certain Pokemon are so rare that you can only get them through special events, or, interestingly enough, cheating and exploiting the glitches or defects in the game to get said Pokemon. These events are easier to come by now because of the internet, but some of them a region exclusive, or only available for a small time, so sometimes it is literally impossible to complete the game and “catch them all.” One of the easiest games to beat the main stories can sometimes be the most difficult to complete, and so again how difficult the game is really depends on how you choose to play it.

Not true of all video games, but that fact that video games are participatory media means that a lot of video games can be as difficult as you make them. Like, If you beat the main plot of Skyrim and focus on very little else but the main story, it’s not that hard. But if your goal is to complete everything in that game, that is both long and no easy feat. How difficult it is becomes more about your personal choice, and really, since you are the one playing, that is really up to you.

So why does it bug me that people saying that using an in game item is “cheating,” or even that using guides (sometimes official guidesis cheating? Well, I guess because I feel there is a double standard routed in a more, interesting concern that is also more controversial in terms of video games. See, I tend to find that “cheating” that uses items like exp share or getting help from guides is more severe than, say, hacking a game for a rare item or creature or encounter or something. That, the “cheating” only matters really when it happens to make the experience “easier.” To me, defining an in game item as a cheat or a guide as a cheat more has to do less on what is an isn’t cheating, but how the gaming community views causal, new, or not as hardcore players. Some  sort of, “too easy” games or “baby game” or, ugh, “participation trophy syndrome.” ugh. 

Now, I might be over generalizing and a lot of people who play these games may not all have the same views. I mean, that was the whole thing I mentioned about “choosing your own difficulty” is that video games and how difficult they are can be largely up to the player, and what they are comfortable with. With that being said, as not everyone agrees on who to tackle a game, not everyone agrees on what is not good about a game, and sometimes what either “cheating” or making a game to easy is. So not everyone thinks that things like the EXP Share and the guides are cheating.

But I find concepts like “fake fans” or “fake nerds” and “casuals” are looped together and that they are the the cause or influence that games are “getting to easy.” Also, that they can’t enjoy a product or game as much as you do if they are not as good or know as much as you. That they can’t have the same input or love for the thing that you also enjoy if they enjoy it differently. This really relates to my own experience with Pokemon cause sometimes I feel like both ends of the stick. That, because I left Pokemon and when I was younger, I don’t know some stuff and “not a real fan,” but I also feel like I’m being a little bit of a douchey know it all when it comes to sun and moon because of just how into it I got. It really makes me think about my role in larger spaces of communities who enjoy the same content as me, especially as I try to be more aware and critical. I want to share my appreciation, not force people who don’t like it to like it, or say that I am right, or yadda yadda; as much as I want to be critically aware. But I that also means I, and I think others in the communities of gaming need to figure out better ways of insensitivity and sharing our love for our shit, and think about why we love shit.

But, before I go into that more, specifically my own experinces and grappling with the “participation trophy” thing more; I really want to come back to my original point (If I haven’t lost you all in my rant already). No where does it say in the Pokemon Sun and moon main game can you not use use exp share, and the only places you can’t your Pokemon are all Changed to level 50 (if above) and no one gets EXP. So I really do not think EXP share or using that is really cheating. And for people who say using guides or outside help is cheating, you aren’t breaking any established rules or re writing rules. Nobody says you can’t talk to your friend to find where a missing item is? This isn’t a University Final this a game! And sharing answers and helping out is how some of these communities are built are by sharing different experiences.

Yeah, okay, so if you can’t do a puzzle without it being explained for you step by step, I can understand how that would be cheating, or at least considered so. But, again, sometimes we need help. We ask our tutors, our teachers, our family, to help us when we get stuck. That isn’t a bad thing. And if Jirard the completionist needed a guides help to find one item or two to complete a game, is that any less of a feat? Is the game any less complete? Or anyone who has beaten a game that needed help finding a specific item to beat or complete all of everything a game has to offer, does it not count if they needed help?

I don’t think so, if you tried to figure it out yourself and you can’t, and you get a tip. There isn’t anything in most games that say you can’t do it, and if there was an event that said you can’t they would probably mention that in the specific event rules. I really don’t think it is cheating. I do think the reason that stuff like that is ties into the other stuff, the “you aren’t X good/knowledgeable/ much of a fan of Y so you can’t play with us” mentality. And I will try to connect those two better when I write the pseudo part 2 to this.

That might be a while, though, because there are some other video game things I want to rant about in the mean time. Again, all of this is just a practice in writing again and ranting my opinions. You don’t have to agree, I am just trying to find a way to better articulate why some opinions are bugging me a little. I could be 100% wrong, or misinformed. But it’s a good exercise to get me thinking and writting before I go back to classes in January.

I will write another one of these soon, but it will probably be on a different subject that might also be Poke related. Talk to you later.

0

Sequels and Fanfiction: Ruining art?

When we think of fanfiction, we probably think of terribly written, poorly edited stories with syntax stapled on to a screen by someone who is intellectually five years old. With Sequels and reboots we tend to see dollar signs in the eyes of over paid network execs and CEOs. The question remains, though, is it really destroying the world of art and fictitious story telling?

One thing you have to remember before you shout “Yes, it was better in my day, all content was original” is that one of the Biggest media conglomerates of all time has been built upon Re-imaginings and “fan” interpretations: Disney.

If you know your Disney, you know most of the famous movies the company did Borrowed and used characters and stories. Robin-hood, Peter Pan, Aladdin, Mulan, Oliver twist, Snow white, Sleeping Beauty, Tarzan, and Alice from “Alice in Wonderland” are just a few of the characters that spring to mind. And with Disney cooperation owning Marvel, Jim Henson, and Lucas Arts properties, even the grittiest of reboots of quite a few of your childhood favourites have that Disney stamp on them somewhere (like Dare Devil and Jessica Jones on Netflix).  Even Disney’s most original property, Mickey Mouse, could be argued to be a reboot of Disney’s own “Oswald the lucky Rabbit,” who Disney made while working for another company and didn’t own the rights too.

On top of that, many of these stories had retellings and re-versioned before Disney (or others) ever laid their mitts on these properties. One glaring example of that is Hercules. Hercules, and other Greek myths, do have multiple variations even in ancient times.

If this is the case, why is it such a big deal things get remade when this phenomena is older than most of us anyway?

THAT I should get into next time

 

0

A review of “The Force Awakens” that tries to be as non-spoiler-y as possible.

I have to admit something to you all, first, before I get this review underway. I am a bad fan.

And I don’t mean of Star Wars. I mean in general. Lots of Franchises I come in late too, miss episodes, don’t know lore verbatim.

Some of that is access. Does the channel always play reruns? Could we afford cable or comics?  Do I have a good enough memory to remember all that I witness/experience  or ability to find all the little pieces hidden away? Did someone challenge or change how I dealt with the franchise because of their feelings towards it?

The last one really hits me with Star Wars.  I just seemed like someone else’s thing. Something that I wasn’t a part of. I like things, I disliked things, and respected it because it did have an impact in both positive and negative fashions in pop culture.

Yet, there was something about this movie.

The best comparison I have is the Avengers (please don’t beat me up and let me explain). I didn’t know all the lore, read every comic about every hero in the Avengers. But there was hype, there were separate egos that were going to clash, and with more drama than an episode of “Desperate house wives” or the cartoon “Totally Spies,” I had an exact idea of what I wanted Avengers to be. And what was Avengers?  A bunch of ego maniacal, self righteous/self important (hero and villains a like) wind bags trading blows and one liners with explosions. It was funny, the characters worked off each other, action was good, and I got EXACTLY what I wanted from it.

And that’s how this ties into Star Wars. The Hype was different, how much I knew (though I DID know a lot for someone who is quite outside the fandom/franchise) and what I knew was different. But that’s just it. People may disagree with me on this, but:

This is, for fans and non fans a like, is the Star Wars movie to see.  It delivers on what it promises, big time.

Some fans have critiqued it as just Recycling the old movies, and the have a fair point. This movie has a tie in to pretty much every movie that predates it, elements that will stick out to those who have seen any of the previous movies. And as much as that can be a draw back, I feel it addresses fans issues with the prequels: they seemed much more Star Wars in name than in story or lay outs.

But it does truly have something new to offer. It continues and fleshes out narratives that we wanted to see. It gives us the old, but it’s not without changes, turns. Some that, may in fact, be vary uncomfortable. Toy Story 3 gives a narrative that is targeted at fans who grew up with those movies, and those people seeing a shift in their world views and Identities. The Force Awakens shows the same, both metaphorically and realistically, time has moved forward in the Star Wars universe, in a way that can make a lot of sense, whether it is good or bad.

It was weird to me to see the ONE movie Lucas was so far removed from did a better (not perfect, but better) job of dealing with two central themes of the Prequels: Adolescence and ones embracing and embodying ones personal evils (“The Dark Side”).

Don’t get me wrong. Sometimes the movie drags, and even though they tried to make it less campy by being more practical than CGI, it sometimes can’t remove the camp element (Some times the storm troopers looked like Power Rangers, and if you don’t know who they are, Google them to see what I mean).  Some times it will seem a little goofy or a little dragged on.

But I haven’t had such real connections with a movie in a while. And not just emotional ones. Sometimes it’s as simple as I feel like I am walking with the character, that I am not only observing their world, but a part of it. Especially in the last scenes. I felt a lot less like that I was watching someone on a journey, rather than taking one myself.

And that’s the thing. Part of me me wants to give this movie just a solid 3/5 just because it’s that: A solid movie. It stands out, flows well (for the most part) and just seemed well put together.

And then there is another part of me, and it feels like I didn’t watch a movie. It just, it made me melancholy, yet full of hope.  Furious at things that transpired or should have been avoided, but ecstatic as to what was to come.

This wasn’t what the prequels were for me. It wasn’t “just entertainment.” It was what Star Wars was supposed to be. It’s a space opera. Dramatized, definitely. Unrealistic? No doubt. But its  a story, a tale, a legend. A mythos in it’s own right, even if you don’t know the background lore. It was a story. An actual, factual, story. A beginning, a middle, an end, put well together that connects you to the elements of someone  else’s imagination.

When you read a book, you watch the story be told. It unfolds for you, over time. It’s not forcing you to believe certain things (at least not out right). It’s showing you what happened, rather than telling it. It’s telling the story to you, who these people were. What they believed. What they did. And it does it such a way I don’t think you haven to even really like the concept of Star Wars to appreciate it.

Old friends come back, new people come in, friends leave, enemies are made.  And I think THOSE elements are what make it accessible to diverse people, and not just the Star Wars fans.

And With that, I would recommend at least checking it out.

0

The unintentional Hiatus

School, work, transitions, and such has made the second year of the Best of you can be relatively strip-less.

I am trying to rectify this, but until this time, please enjoy what little art projects I have been able to start and complete during this semester:

 

bearded.jpg

A friend wanted me to create a logo for a band that starred friends of their’s. This was the result of the prototype.

exaggeration_by_iamsoloj-d9iy3o6.png

This piece I made by accident, and from fooling around.  I was kind of upset that the one I wasn’t asked to do turned out better, and had more focus.

But I thought, lets go back to the first one and see how the second would look mixed with it.

Fusion.jpg

 

Neat, but could be better.

Fusion improved

You know what? I will take it.

The second one is still the best, but if I clean up the last one here and there, it should be pretty close to it.

And that’s all the art I got to do all semester.

0

Ant-man

I wasn’t sure how I would take Paul Rudd being a super, mister Rom com extraordinaire, as Ant-man. But no less surprised then when I learnt  Mark Ruffalo was going to be the hulk, too. I though the movie was going to be really stupid or really great.

Then it turned out to be a Super Hero heist film with essentially Philp J Fry (futurama) and his racist caricature/ Planet Express/ Oceans eleven team, fight Lex Luthor. There was probably more references I could jam in there, but I LOVED the movie. Not my faaavorite, but still up there.

0

The new TMNT series

Is like, kid friendly horror movies. It draws from so many influences. As much as there some stuf fI find silly in it, it’s a show that often forgets that the target demographic is for kids. They HAVE to put some of that in there so the kids would watch it. But even THEN I wouldn’t let my kids watch it alone.

But, I still love the absolute DICK out of it.